Last week my newsfeed alerted me to this article calling for the creation of an ASEAN University. The article notes that in 1992, a previous initiative to create an ASEAN University failed, but that the current drive to integrate Southeast Asia into the ASEAN Community calls for such an institution now:
The original idea of an ASEAN University was based on the need to promote ASEAN-ness among its regional population as well as regional collaboration and integration.
The ASEAN University that I envision, however, looks to the European University Institute, or EUI, located in Florence, Italy. The EUI is a graduate research institution funded by the 21 European Union member states, which not only serves as the historical archive for the European Union but is also engaged in research on various European issues and challenges usually focused on political science, social science and the humanities.
The ASEAN University should have an institutionalised funding arrangement with ASEAN member states, institutional autonomy and full academic freedom. As such, it will be free to engage in graduate research on ASEAN-related topics especially focused on political science, social science and the humanities.
Such an ASEAN University will not only serve the original idea for the institution but also create new knowledge on ASEAN-related challenges, serve as an authority on ASEAN topics and enhance the promotion, conservation and dissemination of the ASEAN region’s rich cultural diversity.
I would agree with the author’s sentiments. The ASEAN Community needs intellectual support in its regional integration efforts. However, I would disagree with the author’s belief that no existing institutions address this need:
No single ASEAN university or institution is focused on conducting research on ASEAN-related issues such as history, culture, society and the challenges and opportunities brought about by the establishment of an ASEAN Community.
Although it is correct that there is only an ASEAN University Network (AUN) of cooperating Southeast Asian institutions and there is no one institution with the ASEAN label, it is not correct that there is no “authoritative institution that serves as a repository of ASEAN-related knowledge or serves as a think-tank focused on the current and future challenges of the ASEAN and its member states.”
To confirm this, one should focus on what the attributes of an ASEAN University Institute (AUI) would look like:
The AUI would have sufficient distance, intellectually and geographically, from the center of power (Brussels in the EU, Jakarta in ASEAN), to encourage academic analysis.
The AUI would be located in a destination different enough from the rest of the region so as to make it appealing to ASEAN policymakers and global scholars.
The AUI would be located in a country with a stake in regional integration yet not involved in any of the continuing controversies (e.g, not a South China Sea claimant).
Finally, the AUI would not have to fight for institutional resources and funding, a major issue when the ASEAN Secretariat has an annual budget less than the annual operating revenue of an American university football team.
The National University of Singapore (NUS), with its Institute of Southeast Asia Studies, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy and the Centre for International Law’s ASEAN integration through law project (and which is headed by Joseph Weiler, the head of the EUI), already serves much of the functions of an AUI. NUS has all of the attributes of the putative AUI described above, and of course, NUS teaches in “Bahasa ASEAN”, e.g., English.
Perhaps what is lacking is greater distribution of the intellectual content. However, the AUN both provides such an avenue and represents a relaxation of institutional rivalries that had prevented such cooperation in the past.
NUS thus already serves as the “ASEAN University Institute” put forward by the author. However, that is not to say that more institutions are not needed; after all, the EU has both the EUI and the College of Europe. My only point is that before embarking on the costly and time-consuming effort to create an ASEAN University Institute, let’s take a proper look at what we already have in the region. –http://aseanec.blogspot.sg/2014/07/an-asean-university-institute-in-all.html
- Asean unions relaunch online complaints mechanism for migrant workers
- Asean official meets ATUC, receives ATUC Bali Declaration
- ATUC leaders meet in Bali, adopt Declaration on key concerns of labour in Asean
- ATUC youth joins conference on reducing youth unemployment and the future of work
- Making women in leadership a norm
What They Say About Us
- Working through the ASEAN Trade Union Council (ATUC), a number of labor groups from Southeast Asia have proposed the ASEAN Social Charter, which they see …
- Labour rights do not feature prominently on ASEAN’s agenda, but the ASEAN Trade Union Council (ATUC) is pushing for a social charter and a framework for the protection of migrant workers.
- ASEAN22 : The ASEAN Social Charter was designed by the ASEAN Trade Union Council (ATUC) and labour-friendly NGOs as a social counterpart to ASEAN’s economic
c/o Trade Union Congress of the Philippines
No. 2 Kalaw-Ledesma Circle, Tierra Verde 2, Tandang Sora, Quezon City 1116